y’all ever think about how insane the sauropods were
this is a leg off of Argentinosaurusof them and its already the size of a two story house like LOOK at the size of these fuckers
the fact that any land animal ever got to be as large as this is insane. this shit is only beat by fucking whales, creatures that dont have to support their weight on legs
First Felon does not consult legal advice. He breaks laws, then tries to find lawyers and judges willing to sacrifice all integrity to enable his crimes.
Breaking the law is MAGA default. Zero court rulings against MAGA crimes will be obeyed.
Civil liberties and personal freedoms threaten abusers/rapists/felons.
“The cruel irony is that thousands of transgender servicemembers have sacrificed—some risking their lives—to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the Military Ban seeks to deny them,” wrote Judge Ana Reyes, a Biden appointee, in her opinion published today. “In the self-evident truth that ‘all people are created equal,’ all means all. Nothing more. And certainly nothing less.”
The court affirmed the President’s ability to discern who can serve the military, but emphasized the high standards needed to do so. “Leaders have used concern for military readiness to deny marginalized persons the privilege of serving,” she wrote. “First minorities, then women in combat, then gays.”
Today, trans people are the target — Trump’s executive order from January declared that being trans “conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle,” and that it “is not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.” The order was accompanied by Hegseth’s anti-trans memo to the Pentagon on Feb. 7.
To categorically ban trans people from the military, the government would have to show that trans inclusion has resulted in tangible, material harm.
The court ruled that this is not the case. Even more, Reyes says that neither Trump’s executive order nor Hegseth’s directive seemed to have received input from military rank and file.
“Neither document contains any analysis nor cites any data,” Reyes writes. “They pronounce that transgender persons are not honorable, truthful, or disciplined—but Defense counsel concedes that these assertions are pure conjecture.”
The plaintiffs, Reyes continues, have cumulatively provided over 130 years of military service. “They have served in roles ranging from Senior Military Science Instructor to Artillery Platoon Commander to Intelligence Analyst to Satellite Operator to Operations Research Analyst to Naval Flight Officer to Weapons Officer,” she writes. “They have deployed around the globe […] One is presently deployed to an active combat zone. They have earned more than 80 commendations.”
The ban was not only discriminatory, Reyes says, but also unscientific. “Who considered the information […] is anyone’s guess. [Trump officials] do not know. Maybe no one, because one study is eight years old and the other two support Plaintiffs’ position [of opposing a trans military ban].”
She characterizes the ban as “soaked in animus and dripping with pretext.”
Judge Ana C. Reyes rules in Talbott v. Trump that Donald Trump’s transphobia-laden ban on trans people serving in the military is “soaked in animus.”
ALT
amhrancas 