jstor:

jenny-hanniver:

gallusrostromegalus:

v-ahavta:

grison-in-space:

elodieunderglass:

lemonsharks:

Hey @elodieunderglass, other nerds on this webbed site, et al, can I have a signal boost for a very silly request?

you know the motif of snails in medieval art (snart)

I’m looking for a particular master’s thesis on this topic, which was:

– probably written within the last 6 years

– definitely within the last 10 years

– the author is probably a woman and

– probably did the masters in the USA

Given snail art (snart) as a topic, there’s a nonzero chance the author is a fellow tumblrina

🐌

Best of luck!

… Paging @kaberett @findingfeather @star-anise ?

@gallusrostromegalus, this sounds like it’s at least tangential to your wheelhouse

@cellarspider ?

Has anyone pinged @jstor yet?

Hi! We love a niche topic, and this is proving to be a bit of a challenge…

Our best result is a journal article from 1995, “MirĂł’s Mystical Mollusks” by Corinne Mandel, viewable for those with JSTOR access. A preview of the text:

“Claudius Aelian considered the snail to be astute by dint of its ability to slither in and out of its shell, and in this way to evade birds bent on the kill. In the Old Testament, conversely, those creatures who slither on their stomachs, including the snail, were listed as forbidden foods. Such was not the case with the ancient Romans, whose gastronomic art led them to devise rather sophisticated methods of fattening land snails, one of their favored foods. Delightful though the snail may have been to the taste, it was thought to be altogether too paranoic on account of its insistence on carrying its house everywhere it went. The snail accordingly came to signify mistrust and deception” (pg. 117).

Probably not the precise thing you’re looking for, but interesting stuff nonetheless!

thatpreciousthing:

naidje:

redwhale:

bewareofitalics:

I think I may have solved a mystery that I didn’t even know was one.

So. In Peter Pan, the novel, this is the first mention of Captain Hook:

“Who is captain now?”

“Hook,” answered Peter, and his face became very stern as he said that hated word.

“Jas. Hook?”

“Ay.”

Then indeed Michael began to cry, and even John could speak in gulps only, for they knew Hook’s reputation.

“He was Blackbeard’s bo’sun,” John whispered huskily. “He is the worst of them all. He is the only man of whom Barbecue was afraid.”

Later, we learn this:

Hook was not his true name. To reveal who he really was would even at this date
set the country in a blaze; but as those who read between the lines must
already have guessed, he had been at a famous public school; and its traditions
still clung to him like garments, with which indeed they are largely concerned.

“Barbecue” is Long John Silver from Treasure Island. Jas. is short for James, but in “Captain Hook at Eton,” he’s also called Jacobus. The biblical figure Jacob was renamed Israel.

Blackbeard’s historical boatswain, and also a character in Treasure Island, was Israel Hands.

I’m just saying, if I got a hand chopped off and my last name was Hands… I might want to change it.

Many kudos to OP, I’m still processing Captain Hook = Israel Hands. Because of this post, I stumbled upon this 2020 article. It is a fascinating and bittersweet read about Barrie, Stevenson, and the Peter Pan+Treasure Island connections.

Now, the letters of JM Barrie to Robert Louis Stevenson – presumed to be lost by several key Barrie biographers for over 70 years – will be published for the first time in a forthcoming book. The letters reveal how ardently the young Barrie both adored and admired Stevenson, who was an older and more established writer. A year into their friendship, which was initiated by Stevenson, Barrie wrote to him: “To be blunt I have discovered (have suspected it for some time) that I love you, and if you had been a woman…” He leaves the sentence unfinished.

and

Barrie has a real desire to incorporate Stevenson and his affection for Stevenson in his works, he believes. “I think what Barrie is saying is: if I can never meet Stevenson, because he has unfortunately died, then I want to create the opportunity for our characters to meet.

“I think he liked that idea that they could occupy the same world, and could potentially bump into each other.”

Screenshot of text from Homestuck

Dave: well shit  

Dave: thats a hell of a mystery no one thought was a mystery and didn't even really need solving. 

Dave: but damn if it didnt just get solved so nice work.

morlock-holmes:

Also, I am just going to say it:

If your CEO is so inconsequential to the success of your company that he can be gunned down in the street like a dog and it has absolutely no impact on your company whatsoever, maybe he doesn’t actually need to be paid several hundred times as much as your median employee.

Maybe you could get away with, like, ten to fifteen times and spend the extra tens of millions of dollars you save on something else.

Just thinking out loud.

tobiasdrake:

babblingfishes:

inklesspen:

falliblefabrial:

acreaturecalledgreed:

the concept and idea of “you can always start trying to be a better person” is extremely important to me both in media and irl and i continue to be deeply deeply disturbed by the trend on this site pushing that these ideas in media are bad writing or even morally reprehensible

because theyd rather someone stay terrible or just straight up die than become a better person 

from a compassionate point of view it’s deeply distressing
and from a pragmatic point of view it’s outright frustrating

it’s fucked up. 

What is the most important step a man can take?

The next.

I think part of the pushback about this is the idea that, to “redeem” bad people, their victims must first forgive them for unforgivable acts.

This is false. No one is obligated to forgive you. You can learn from your mistakes and become the best, kindest person on earth, and the
people you’ve hurt still won’t forgive you, and you’ll have to accept that. And that doesn’t mean you aren’t allowed to grow. Because we aren’t just “pure” or “sinful”, we’re complex.

Sometimes the bridge is just burnt. Sometimes what your victim needs to recover from the way you treated them isn’t your atonement. It’s your absence. They just want to live a life without you in it.

I think that’s an important piece of nuance that gets lost in media, due to the conflation of redemption with forgiveness. Sometimes you will not be forgiven. You will not get to have the relationship back. No matter how much you work on yourself, you have to go away now. You are not welcome here. You never will be again.

And that’s okay. Victims shouldn’t be under obligation to forgive, and attaining forgiveness shouldn’t be the goal of working on yourself. It’s okay to let bridges be burnt. If someone needs your absence, it’s okay to give it to them. And it’s okay to take the better version of you that you’ve become, and move on with your life.

Because I promise you, there is something else out there waiting for the better you to find it.

lightyakami:

it is genuinely bewildering to me that adult human beings do not know this but if you are mean to people they will not like you. like tbh they are probably also not going to like you if you are mean to other people but they are definitely not going to like you if you are mean to them. it doesn’t matter if you are funny or if you can use r/aita rules to prove that you are in the right. people simply so not enjoy being treated like shit.