Is she a “forgotten woman of history” or is this just the first time you’ve personally heard about her?
This is broadly about the clickbait titling convention of claiming a woman is unknown or forgotten when the person is going to read you a reasonably extensive Wiki page.
And Wiki pages citing several books and articles are notoriously a sure sign that someone isn’t the least bit forgotten.
*gently takes your hand* it is ok to learn new information and to want to present it to people. That’s how we all learn.
But, just because the information is new to you does not mean it is not already extensively documented. This is especially true if it’s from a different geographic context than your own and you might not have learned in your pre-university history education.
It’s ok to say something is just interesting and cool without suggesting that you’ve found something new that the field or society at large have forgotten. Information does not need to be novel to be fascinating.
amhrancas 