The irony of doing deforestation in a land that already has nearly no forests, only to place some giant bird-killing things there in the name of “green energy.” Don’t let me even get started about how much harmful manufacturing processes need to take place to make wind turbines.
>the trees that were cut down were a commercial crop that would have been cut down regardless
>this was over a 20 year period that they planted 272 million more trees
>That 14 million is less than 1% of the total woodland area in scotland
Also, scottlands peat bogs are excellent at carbon sequestration, and misguided attempts at “"reforesting”“ the peat bogs back in the 80s and 90s resulted in hundreds of thousands of failed trees and destroyed the actual natural habitat of peat and heath.
Assume that anyone posting a screenshot of an article headline with no link to the actual source is pushing an agenda. Pause. Think. What is the purpose of the posting? Why isn’t there a way to verify what the post is saying or makes you assume? What information could be in the article that they are hiding by not providing?
Now search for the article by the headline and author and read it yourself
amhrancas 